Cattle urine’s planet-warming power can be curtailed with land restoration
When cow urine falls on degraded land, it releases far more nitrous oxide – a potent greenhouse gas – than when absorbed by healthy pasture. The findings of a new study show additional benefits of landscape restoration and conservation.
The exceptional climate-altering capabilities of cattle are mainly due to methane, which they blast into the atmosphere during their daily digestive routine.
“Degraded pastures are bad in so many ways,” said Ngonidzashe Chirinda, a CIAT researcher and the study’s lead author. Cattle urine is a lesser-known climate offender. “This study adds to the case for land restoration. Degraded pastures not only affect food security and the livelihood of farmers today but affects the livelihood of future farmers because they emit more gases that cause global warming.”
It produces nitrous oxide (N2O), which has warming power far greater than that of carbon dioxide (CO2), the main driver of global warming. A study conducted by the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) and partners shows that these N2O emissions can be significantly curbed by healthy cattle pastures.
For the study, researchers collected urine from cattle at research sites in five countries across Latin America and the Caribbean.
They split these 500 mL samples on paired cattle fields classified as degraded or healthy, which was determined by vegetation coverage. In six of the seven test sites, degraded pastures emitted significantly more N2O – sometimes up to three times as much.
The results were published January 29 in Scientific Reports, an open-access journal by the publishers of Nature.
The results add urgency to global land restoration agreements, including Initiative 20×20, which aims to bring into restoration 20 million hectares of land into restoration in Latin America by 2020 as a first major step toward even more ambitious restoration targets.
Estimates vary, but Chirinda calculates, conservatively, that there are 150 million hectares of degraded lands in Latin America. Brazil alone is home to some 80 million hectares of degraded pastureland.
Degraded livestock land is generally characterized by overgrazing, soil compaction, loss of organic material and low levels of nutrients and soil carbon.
Large-scale land restoration with improved forage grasses, rotational grazing and the addition of shrubs and trees (silvopastoral farming) could significantly mitigate the negative climate effects wrought by degradation.
In addition to reducing N2O emissions, restored landscapes generally contain more carbon, have healthier soils and more robust and productive livestock.
“This study highlights the importance of avoiding land degradation in the first place,” said Todd Rosenstock, a co-author based at the World Agroforestry (ICRAF). “Maintaining healthy pastures appears to reinforce goals of both the United Nations’ Framework Convention on Climate Change and the UN Convention to Combat Desertification simultaneously.”
The curious results from the single test site that did not align with the study results – in Taluma, Colombia – may be attributed to a number of factors that merit further research. N2O emissions there were by far the lowest at any test site and were the same on both degraded and healthy pastures.
The cattle urine used in the experiment had the lowest nitrogen content compared to the other research sites, which likely contributed to the results. The forage grass used there, Brachiaria humidicola, also has an especially high nitrification inhibition capacity, meaning that it prevents nitrogen from becoming N2O.
The study is a victory for well-designed, modest-budget science. The project began with a weeklong training session at CIAT headquarters in Cali, Colombia, where a team of PhD students from the additional participating countries – Argentina, Brazil, Nicaragua and Trinidad and Tobago – helped design the research plan and standardized the study’s methodology.
The students returned to their home countries and carried out the experiment to coincide with their area’s rainy seasons, to assure similar climate conditions across study sites. (The exception was Taluma, which was sampled during a period characterized by low rainfall, which is also another possible reason why the N2O emissions were lower there).
“The power is in the number of data points from all the different countries,” said Chirinda.
Researchers said the study is a useful step toward creating a more detailed picture of the scope of greenhouse gas emissions from cattle farming in LAC.
“Since working on emissions from livestock in the region is not common, this study generates at least one piece of information that is missing from theoretical greenhouse gas estimates in the LAC region,” said Miguel Andrés Arango, a co-author and scientist at Colombia’s AGROSAVIA, the nation’s largest agriculture research organization.
“Being able to estimate the real impact of cattle production will allow us to propose potential practices for reducing emissions,” said Arango. “It is high time we know the emission factors for our agricultural systems.”